JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 9, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Astrid Katherine Muñoz Muñoz

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Aclaración de la Sentencia T-011/19.

La memorialista, en calidad de líder jurídica de la Dirección de Consulta Previa del Ministerio del Interior, solicitó la aclaración de la orden octava del fallo de la referencia.

De manera particular pidió a la Corte delimitar sobre qué proyectos, obras o actividades se debía adelantar el proceso de consulta previa ordenado.

Teniendo en cuenta que la aclaración rogada se formuló de manera extemporánea, la Sala de Revisión decidió RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-011 de 2019.
  2. SEGUNDO. INFORMAR al solicitante que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR la presente providencia a la entidad solicitante.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.